Back to Posts
Posts

The Two Biggest Challenges to Creating an Environment That's Truly Safe

EHSQ Alliance Affiliate

What is safe? If you aren’t asking this question, you might be facing more risk than you think.

What’s “safe?” Where can “safe” be found? Are you thinking about it?

Defining “safe” is not as easy as it sounds. Think too globally and you start contemplating terrorism and environmental catastrophes. Think too locally and it’s about street crime and burglars in your neighborhood. But interestingly, once you’ve had that thought, you’re probably thinking, “Do I need to fit better locks?”

This is a perfectly logical response to a perceived threat. Nearly a century ago, A.H. Maslow described a hierarchy of human needs in which he recognized that feeling safe was the second most fundamental requirement for humans, beaten only by our physiological needs for food, air and water.

Even without being told this, we know it - just ask anyone who’s ever been woken in the dead of night by an unfamiliar creak of a floorboard. Instantly wide-awake, your mind urgently races to calculate all possible scenarios. And then, as you pad around your home in your slippers at 3 a.m. desperately hoping not to bump into anyone, you contemplate how you could be better prepared for a home-invasion scenario.

Problem No. 1: We Rely on Fight or Flight

And right there is problem No.1 about safety: We tend to react to perceived threats. That fight-or-flight mechanism, that rush of adrenaline and laser-sharp thinking about the problem, doesn’t begin until the bad thing is already happening. Why is that? Why do we wait until the dead-of-night house patrol to contemplate our home defense plan?

We live and work in environments in which people care about our safety. Manufacturers are required to comply with legally binding safety guidance. Our toasters come with instructions that take the time to tell us not to use the device in the bath. Every plastic bag warns us of its potential suffocation hazard. And, apparently, peanut butter may contain nuts. Translate this to the workplace and you can probably throw a company health and safety policy into the mix.

There’s a policy? Hey, I’m covered.

Or are you? In recent years, a number of reports have found that the safer cars are designed to be, the worse people tend to drive. The argument runs that when other people are paid to consider our safety, the less we think about it. And do you know what one of the leading causes of workplace injury in the U.S. is? Same-level falls. People walking along a flat, level floor and falling over.

Problem No. 2: We Dismiss Hazards, Especially the Most Common Ones

Let’s be honest, a same-level fall doesn’t even sound like a threat, does it? It’s just walking, right? And there’s problem No.2: We tend to dismiss many hazards because they don't seem hazardous enough.

If it’s not a Lara Croft-style gauntlet of swinging blades that has to be negotiated to get to the coffee machine, we assume it doesn’t pose a risk to our safety. But you know what? Same-level falls cost employers $11.2 billion, according to the 2018 Liberty Mutual Workplace Safety Index. That’s a risk - both to employers and to the workers who are involved in those incidents. There don’t appear to be any figures for swinging blade injuries...

But seriously: $11.2 billion! What slice of that do you want? It’s an important question to ask because you’re paying it. Whether you are the employer or the employee, you’re doing the paying in the form of lost earnings, personal injury and hospital bills. As an individual, workplace hazards - however mundane - pose a threat to your earning potential. As an employer, you could end up stuck without a key staff member during your busiest period - not to mention costly injury claims.

So, how’s that adrenaline-based, reactionary risk response working out for you now? And what can we do to tune into workplace hazards before they become a problem?

It’s a complicated question. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) produces guidance for people who are required to lift things. Their solution to that risk? “Eliminate unnecessary lifts.”

Okay, but what about the risk people obviously face when walking on a level floor? We can’t stop people from walking, so now what? Well, NIOSH recommends education and training.

Training to walk? Really? Maybe not, but how about training not to walk while reading reports? How about explaining that texting and walking can impact your ability to pay your mortgage? Because, as we said at the start, if we think there’s a credible threat, we’re pre-conditioned to respond. That's why it’s so important to at least encourage that third option: fight, flight or at least put the cellphone away.

If you’re a manager, your adrenaline should already be pumping. If you aren’t thinking about the most basic safety issues, your professional safety is at risk, and the threat is your share of $11.2 billion - and that’s just for falls. Let’s not wait for the unexpected creak in the darkness to work out our coping strategies.

(This post was originally published here by Safeopediaa member of the Intelex Strategic Alliance Program. Republished with permissionSafeopedia aims to create the ultimate resource for the EHS industry. At Safeopedia, they believe that environmental health & safety information should be in the public domain for anyone and everyone who truly wants to learn, share, collaborate and make the world a better - and safer - place. They are committed to providing free environmental health & safety education and information to the industry and the public at large.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MATERIALS DISCLAIMER

This material provided by the Intelex Community and EHSQ Alliance is for informational purposes only. The material may include notification of regulatory activity, regulatory explanation and interpretation, policies and procedures, and best practices and guidelines that are intended to educate and inform you with regard to EHSQ topics of general interest. Opinions are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Intelex. The material is intended solely as guidance and you are responsible for any determination of whether the material meets your needs. Furthermore, you are responsible for complying with all relevant and applicable regulations. We are not responsible for any damage or loss, direct or indirect, arising out of or resulting from your selection or use of the materials.

 

January 11, 2019 @ 03:50 PM EST Manufacturing, Construction, Energy - Oil and Gas, Food and Beverage, Automotive, Transportation Services Health & Safety

This Post hasn't been commented on yet.
Login or Sign Up to comment.