Back to Posts

Former OSHA Head Says Contractor Should be Blacklisted for Safety Violations: Can the Government Do That?

EHSQ Alliance Contributor

Employers should at least be aware of the fact that blacklisting remains a possible legal maneuver a future administration could choose to unleash.

By Patrick Dennison and Travis Vance

Harkening back to the “Blacklists” imposed by the Obama administration, Dr. David Michaels, former assistant secretary of Labor for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, urged the government to ban a construction contractor from work on public lands in a tweet after the company pleaded guilty on charges related to the death of a worker. But can the government even do that?

Yes, at least to some extent. In July 2014, then-President Barack Obama issued Executive Order 13673 entitled the “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces,” which many referred to as the “Blacklisting” Executive Order. The Blacklisting Order required companies bidding or submitting offers for federal contract work over a certain amount to disclose any administrative merits determinations, arbitral awards or decisions, and civil judgments against them in the preceding three years related to potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act, National Labor Relations Act, and Family Medical Leave Act, among others. The federal contracting officer would then, before making an award, consider safety violations when awarding government contracts, putting companies with records of numerous serious, repeated, or willful OSHA violations at risk of being denied work. 

Shortly after issuing the order, the Department of Labor and the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council proposed regulations and guidance to administer the law, which the Obama administration finalized in August 2016. After that, industry trade associations challenged the rule’s validity in federal court, securing a preliminary injunction to bar the enforcement of the so-called “Blacklisting” provisions of the rule. In March 2017, President Trump used the 1996 Congressional Review Act to effectively invalidate the “Blacklisting” rule. 

Yes, the government could “blacklist” a company from public contracts due to habitual OSHA violations. However, despite former Assistant Secretary Michaels’ continued public endorsement of the practice, the federal blacklisting of companies remains, at least for now, prohibited. In order for his wish to come true, the federal government would need to once again set up a formal apparatus for levying and enforcing a blacklisting order, and it would need to withstand the inevitable court challenges that would follow. There seems to be no appetite under the current administration for something like that to be enacted in the near future, but employers should at least be aware of the fact that blacklisting remains a possible legal maneuver a future administration could choose to unleash.

About the Authors: Patrick Dennison is a partner in Fisher Phillips’ Pittsburgh office and is a member of the Workplace Safety and Catastrophe Management Practice Group. Patrick primarily represents companies challenging enforcement actions by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).  Patrick’s extensive knowledge of MSHA and OSHA laws and regulations combined with experience gives him a deep understanding of the industries he represents to provide sophisticated representation and counsel to his clients. Travis Vance is a partner in the firm’s Charlotte office and co-chair of the firm's Workplace Safety and Catastrophe Management Practice Group. He has tried matters across several industries and various subject matters, including employment litigation, business disputes and matters prosecuted by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). He uses unique or outside-the-box approaches to counsel employers and owners on all aspects of employment law and the development of preventive policies and procedures to avoid employment and workplace safety-related claims. Travis handles litigation in both federal and state courts as well as claims pending with state and federal agencies including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), MSHA, OSHA, and the U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL).

Republished with permission from Fisher Phillips’ Workplace Safety and Health Law Blog.



This material provided by the Intelex Community and EHSQ Alliance is for informational purposes only. The material may include notification of regulatory activity, regulatory explanation and interpretation, policies and procedures, and best practices and guidelines that are intended to educate and inform you with regard to EHSQ topics of general interest. Opinions are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Intelex. The material is intended solely as guidance and you are responsible for any determination of whether the material meets your needs. Furthermore, you are responsible for complying with all relevant and applicable regulations. We are not responsible for any damage or loss, direct or indirect, arising out of or resulting from your selection or use of the materials.

October 07, 2019 @ 09:24 AM EDT Construction, Chemical, Manufacturing Health & Safety

This Post hasn't been commented on yet.
Login or Sign Up to comment.